To: eabinga
These are earthly-perspective statements, and would fit a scenario of an earth that started out with a continuously cloudy sky, but later the atmosphere cleared and the lights became visible. Funny that astronomers continue to talk of sunrise and sunset to this day; isn't that unscientific too?
103 posted on
02/15/2003 7:05:49 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(more dangerous than an OrangeNeck)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Funny that astronomers continue to talk of sunrise and sunset to this day; isn't that unscientific too? Funny you should mention that. Bucky Fuller pointed this out decades ago and tried his whole life to come up with better terms than sunrise and sunset. Never could. I ponder it once in a while, but would it really matter?
To: HiTech RedNeck
In a way it is, just as it's nonscientific to refer to "weighing" something when you're determining its mass, and atheists who speak Spanish, Russian, and English still say "adios," "spasibo," and "goodbye" despite the words' religious origins. OTOH, I'd say there's not a lot of point to coming up with a circumlocution for "sunset" and "sunrise."
259 posted on
02/16/2003 2:14:25 PM PST by
jejones
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson