To: conservativecorner; sirchtruth; Fred Mertz; Miss Marple; Randjuke; Redleg Duke; gonzo; Vinnie; ...
Any thoughts on this major major problem we face with the Senate?
4 posted on
02/15/2003 6:54:15 AM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: marajade
your thoughts on this?
6 posted on
02/15/2003 7:16:38 AM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: TLBSHOW
I don't think the comments by Gerry over-rule the words and procedures of the Constitution and the Senate itself. Therefore calls to have the Senate represent Commercial or Moneyed interests are out of place.
I would be happy with old State appointment. That alone would be enough to lift the pliebisitory nature of the Senators. What we need is the deliberative representation that allows independence and cool heads in that body. Right now, they are more driven by political whim and popular mood than the House...a real reversal. That situation then extends to keeping their seat by voting benefits for those wanting government to take and take.
7 posted on
02/15/2003 7:19:19 AM PST by
KC Burke
To: TLBSHOW
This isn't going to be a "major problem" for long. Any number of things are going to release this logjam: 1) when war starts, and the public focuses on the safety of our country and our troops, ANYONE obstructing ANYTHING will suffer the voters' wrath. Some may face recalls. 2) Some Dems will break rank, if for no other reason than their own "pork barrel" stuff will be squelched. 3) The GOP can, and will, play increasingly hard ball. Don't be surprised if Rush's suggestion to stymie all contact with Linda Daschle's lobbying firms doesn't appear. 4) IF the Dems get too uppity, Bush will make recess appointments like you wouldn't believe. 5) I'm convinced the economy will quickly come back when the war is over, and when that happens, Bush's popularity will again be at 80+ percent, and THIS TIME, I don't think he will hesitate to use the bully pulpit on these matters, tying the judges to national security.
12 posted on
02/15/2003 9:22:11 AM PST by
LS
To: TLBSHOW
Our system of government, I believe, is still strong.
These individuals are broken and need to be removed. Election 2004 hopefully will be the answer to removing a large number of them.
Harry Reid
Tom Daschle
John Corzine
Tim Johnson
Patrick Leahy
Charles Schumer
Barbara Boxer
Robert Byrd
Hillary Clinton
Russ Feingold
Patrick Leahy
Patty Murry
Sarbanes
Richard Durbin
So that it's bipartisan I'll add
Arlan "Scottish Rule" Spectre
Jim "jumping" Jeffords
They are petty, unforgiving, bitter individuals who can't see past their own personal issues to govern on behalf of America.
21 posted on
02/27/2003 7:05:50 PM PST by
swheats
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson