[Sentis]

"you have clearly demonstrated, any evidence that does not line up with the sacred evolutionary model can be disregarded. "

Nope any evidence that is made up of lies and deceptions by creationists with an ax to grind against scientific research can pretty much be disregarded.

If the creationists came up with anything that was halfway scientific real scientists would take a look at it. An example the Bigfoot/Yeti "Myth". Recently some real scientists have reexamined this (notably the Yeti) because some DNA evidence that may support it has been found. Now most scientists would just have ignored people that said a yeti was running around except those same people that screamed Yeti finally brought in something that looks like proof. When the DNA evidence is completely examined and discovered to not be yeti hair we can go back to laughing at those people. The same is true of creationists.

[bondserv]

Yeti would seem to support evolution. There is the hunger for pursuing this lead.

If you are a scuba diver are you going to order a magazine about parachuting?

Please allow us to at least try to put some new views of the evidence on the table. Be patient, many good scientists are just now beginning to feel bold enough to float their findings that don't line up with the status quo.

Maybe someday you might take up parachuting.