[jennyp]

Learning from some of the links and ideas posted here is a favorite pastime. Thank You for your contributions that you have made.

I'm curious. Have you read the links we provided regarding the Moon Dust argument or the Moon's Recession argument? Have they made "the smallest dent" in your reliance on them?

[bondserv]

See post #36

Allow me to reemphasize, I do not claim to know how much dust there should be on the moon.

Scientists made calculations to determine how much space dust would be on the moon. They then went to great lengths by putting giant pods on the lunar lander. They also made the ladder on the lander to short, which forced Armstrong to leap from the ladder. No one had measurement instrumentation on the moon. Scientists then made incorrect calculations to determine the amount.

My most important point is that the links provided often make so many assumptions (and the moon dust link clearly does much of this), that to make such definitive statements as these scientists do is to trust unreliable information. He sets up formulas as if he has had measurement equipment on the moon for 4.6 billion years.

Until all of the illegitimate assumptions (I recognize sometimes assumptions are necessary) are removed from the Theory of Evolution I will place no faith in it. Place your faith in it if you choose, but don't expect people who have legitimate problems with the theory to.