[sackofcatfood]

It's a valid claim if they have evidence and analysis to support it. If you have some time, pick up an issue of Scientific American. I have a hard time justifying publishing that and not some of the better creationist articles I've read. The important thing here is to let everybody have their say, not just people you *want* to have their say.

In advocating censorship of claims which conflict with the presently accepted paradigm, you are essentially just a modernized extension of the Spanish Inquisition.

Congratulations.

[APBaer]

"In advocating censorship of claims which conflict with the presently accepted paradigm, you are essentially just a modernized extension of the Spanish Inquisition."

Sure you didn't cut and paste that from a patent application for a perpetual motion machine?