Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: belmont_mark; HighRoadToChina; maui_hawaii; Paul Ross; Orion78; Jeff Head; swarthyguy; ...
A bump and a ping keepin' this one alive....
110 posted on 05/13/2003 7:01:32 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: belmont_mark
Thanks for the heads up!
114 posted on 05/13/2003 10:03:37 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: belmont_mark
China seem to hedge its bet between Russian and Western technology, and it is quite interesting to see that they have two prongs in their strategy: one of independent western type development, and the other the convenience of cheap yet effective Russian arms.

The big picture people are missing here is the comprehensive and serious approach of China. These people are not stupid, and it is strange to see the arrogance of some here about Chinese inabilities and disabilities when TAs and researchers at US universities teaching them some stuff come from China in great part...
136 posted on 05/14/2003 3:29:31 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: JudgemAll
On that note....


WHITE PAPER: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORPORATIONS IN SUPPORT OF HOMELAND SECURITY


February 14th, 2003 A.D.


Given the various strikes against the West and our allies, including the EP-3 attack, 9/11 and others, it has become abundantly clear to truly discerning analysts that massive conflict between the Trans-Asian Axis and ourselves, as described by such authors as Jan Senja, Anatoliy Golitsyn, J.R. Nyquist, Yossef Bodansky, Col. Lunev, and Dr. Alexandr Nemets, is inevitable.


In addition to overt threats posed by terrorism and WMD against the West and allies, there are dangerous behaviors that we, in the West and truly allied nations, theoretically have ultimate control over. What we are specifically referring to are behaviors demonstrated by certain corporations based in the US, or operating in the US, which, ultimately, based on the observation in the first paragraph, serve to undermine the security of the West and our allies.


Certain corporations have, for some years, done, and continue at present, to do, the following things:


A. Sell dual use items and technologies to customers in nation states whose goals include the destruction of the West and our allies.


B. Conduct operations in nations whose goals include the destruction of the West and our allies.


C. Recruit, hire and employ citizens of nations whose goals include the destruction of the West and our allies, both for assignments in their own nations, and, in the West and allied nations.


D. Source supplies and services from nations whose goals include the destruction of the West and our allies.


Based on the apparent geopolitical timbre of the times, these behaviors not only constitute a long term threat, due to the likely future supply and business interruptions, of corporations themselves, but may actually constitute treason, espionage and violation of the Patriot Act. In order to prevent any further damage to Homeland Security, the following explicit recommendations are made:


1.All employees of corporations based in or operating in the USA and abroad should be thoroughly investigated by the FBI, US Attorney, Homeland Security, and others as applicable, for treason, espionage and terrorist activity or support. This must include all managers and executives in order to be maximally effective.


2.All operations in, export to and sourcing from, the following nation states should be ended or proscribed by no later than June 1, 2003: The People's Republic of China, Russia and other former Soviet states, The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Laos, Vietnam, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Angola, Brazil, Venezuela, Cuba, and, Libya.


3.Focussed investigations should be made by the CIA and DIA regarding operations involving MCST in Russia, the Russian government and governments of Soviet states, the government and army of the PRC (and companies partly held by them) as well as the government of Pakistan.


4.Aggressive prosecution, for any crimes described herein, of employees, management, executives, partners, board members and others having specific relationships with offending firms.


We surmise that only by taking aggressive action in these regards may we prevent further compromise of our Homeland Security and our position in coming military conflicts.


The Founders of the New Alliance, Concerned Employees and shareholders of General Electric, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Hewlett Packard, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Dell Computer, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Sun Microsystems, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Tyco, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Boeing, Concerned Employees and shareholders of General Motors, Concerned Employees and shareholders of IBM, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Daimler Chrysler, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Microsoft, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Cisco Systems, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Solectron, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Loral Space Systems, Concerned Employees and shareholders of Hughes.


CC: FBI, Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney


137 posted on 05/14/2003 3:33:58 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: belmont_mark
The global strategic situation is getting warmer.

Taiwan and North Korea are the biggest hotspots with the most potential for armed conflict on a large scale. It has more to do that with just China.

194 posted on 05/14/2003 8:48:04 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson