[MEGoody]

"As far as I'm concerned that's what the ad purchaser was doing. Perverting the words of God for his own ends."

Ah, so you feel it is perfectly acceptable to judge the intent of someone's heart.

Then obviously, you won't mind someone judging your intents. You seem to be ignoring pretty clearly what God has said, and your intent seems to be to bear false witness.

The purchaser of the ad did not change the words of God as shown in the bible. Therefore, he obviously is not perverting them.

[yendu bwam]

The purchaser of the ad did not change the words of God as shown in the bible. Therefore, he obviously is not perverting them.

Precisely.

[Snowyman]

The purchaser of the ad did not change the words of God as shown in the bible. Therefore, he obviously is not perverting them.

Really. Learn to read. I said combined with graphics Does your bible have the graphics? . The graphics that the purchaser added with the intent of inciting a negative reaction towards homosexuals. Without the graphics the ad does not make the same point. All it would be would be verses from the bible. Which are printed and read every day.

The bottom line is the court judged the intent , not the source of the words.