Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrLeRoy
[Because there was no constitutional question before it to resolve?]

No; "Because the Court of Appeals did not address these claims

Yes. If the Court of Appeals did not address these claims, then there was no constitutional question before the USSC for it to resolve.

And as previously pointed out, there is no judicial controversy to settle on that point. The constitutionality of the CSA has been upheld every time the question has been considered.

434 posted on 02/14/2003 10:06:03 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe
The constitutionality of the CSA has been upheld every time the question has been considered.

Ditto for the Roe v Wade ruling; color me unimpressed.

436 posted on 02/14/2003 10:08:24 AM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe
The constitutionality of slavery was upheld every time the question had been considered.

The constitutionality of gun restrictions were upheld every time the question has been considered.

The constitutionality of unlimited taxation has been upheld every time the question has been considered.

The constitutionality of damn near everything congress can dream up has been upheld damn near every time the question has been considered.
441 posted on 02/14/2003 10:17:40 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson