Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ambrose
Eight years in jail for serving beer in your own home is utterly unspeakable. And anybody who supports this kind of sentencing is acting like a knee-jerk anti-American fascist.

Sorry if this offends some on this thread who have come out in support of this insane sentence. But I find it absolutely incredible that so-called conservatives, who generally want to keep government out of our lives and who generally believe in taking responsibility for one's own actions, would come out in support of the police-state that our country is rapidly becoming. This is what the liberal/Marxists want. Soon they will be putting people in jail for exposing teenagers to second-hand smoke. Just wait and see. Will the same folks cheering this sentence be cheering then as well?

Were the parents foolish in supplying liquor to underage teenagers? Absolutely. Should they be held accountable? Absolutely. Do they deserve eight years in jail? Absolutely not. This is totally crazy. Especially when wife-beaters and armed robbers and even some rapists are treated more leniently by our court system. And especially when the president of the United States is allowed to have his underling perform oral sex upon him in the workplace and get away scot-free. We really need to get our priorities straight in this country. When even the conservatives are getting on the nanny government bandwagon, I begin to get concerned.

46 posted on 02/13/2003 5:27:13 AM PST by SamAdams76 ('Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76
Those are exactly my feelings, Sam.
49 posted on 02/13/2003 5:33:29 AM PST by FreeTally (How did a fool and his money get together in the first place?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
Soon they will be putting people in jail for exposing teenagers to second-hand smoke. ... Will the same folks cheering this sentence be cheering then as well?

I'll take that bet, you know they will!

On another note, I've never understood why you are allowed to drive before you're allowed to drink. It makes sense to me that you should first learn (if you decide to drink at all) how alcohol affects you before you ever get behind the wheel.

67 posted on 02/13/2003 6:33:15 AM PST by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
"Eight years in jail for serving beer in your own home is utterly unspeakable."

I would agree, if it had been only their own kids. They served alcohol to other people's kids.

"Soon they will be putting people in jail for exposing teenagers to second-hand smoke."

Come on, are yu saying these kids were only being exposed to second-hand alcohol? Your comparison doesn't work.

97 posted on 02/13/2003 7:20:17 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
Very well put, sir.
174 posted on 02/13/2003 9:15:37 AM PST by Under the Radar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
"This is what the liberal/Marxists want. Soon they will be putting people in jail for exposing teenagers to second-hand smoke. Just wait and see.

We don't have to wait, my friend. We already have people being fined, hundreds of dollars, for violating "smoking bans" in drinking establishments.

Hope all is well with you and yours

Regards

182 posted on 02/13/2003 9:33:53 AM PST by Tinman (The erosion of our liberties continues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
When even the conservatives are getting on the nanny government bandwagon, I begin to get concerned.

Conservatives aren't getting on the nanny government bandwagon, Republicans are. They have always wanted as much government control as the Democrats, just social control instead of fiscal.

185 posted on 02/13/2003 9:49:17 AM PST by fish70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
Were the parents foolish in supplying liquor to underage teenagers? Absolutely. Should they be held accountable? Absolutely.

Why? I much rather my kid(s) drink at home than on the street. If they are good, school up to par, why not? It is a BS societal law that kids dont drink. If I can drink at 17 in the service, My kids can drink at 17 in my home. I don't need accounting for that...

Regards...

SR

222 posted on 02/13/2003 2:15:00 PM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson