Your apocalyptic view of the world is harmless, if deluded. I can see why you chose Quix as a handle, short for Quixotic, as you seem a champion for causes which sane people cannot join. However, I don't understand why you are here, where people deal with worldly matters and issues that might persist for generations. If I believed as you do, I'd retreat into monastacism, as the early Christians did when they believed in Christ's imminent return.
Since you are so interested in the term Defiant, I will tell you that it has to do with my attitude towards the police state that the Clintons and their gang of thugs had towards freedom-loving people in June 1998 when I chose this handle for this site, changing the handle I had been using for a couple years here to avoid identification that would result in visits from the Little Rock Mafia or the Janet Reno DOJ. We had people here who were regularly reporting such visits, IRS audits, etc. I was not going to acquiesce in the takeover of the government by this soft type of authoritarianism, and defiantly posted about Clinton's corruption and evil. I see the Clintons gained a convert to their way of thinking during their 8 year reign.
Interestingly, murderers in OTestament times could flee to cities of refuge and as long as they made it and stayed there and behaved themselves for a length of time, they were left alone.
Interestingly, murderers in Old Testament times might be stoned. Your point?
Your assumptions about me are, to my mind, much more irrational and a much greater stretch and much harsher than my very minor ones about you. Yet you censure me.
I wrote a one-line statement that the sentence was unjust, and you then suggested that I was drunk when I wrote it, and started asking about my screen name. Yes, I censure you for that, even while addressing the substance of your comments. You were intemperate.