Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrLeRoy
Yes, I do. The judge was making a point and acting within the sentencing guidelines.

Do I believe eight years is too long for a first-time offender? Yes. But being fully aware of how probation and parole work, I also understand that they will almost certainly be out in two years or less. The point is made, and a just sentence will be served. That sounds about right.

In my estimation it is the large number of teens involved that makes this an especially egregious offense. The prosecutor's recommendation might have made sense if the case had involved only a half dozen or so teens. But 60 teens? The parents might just as well have fired 60 rounds from a rifle randomly down the length of a busy interstate highway. To plead for leniency because no bullet found a target is foolish. Statistically, it was a miracle no one was killed.

169 posted on 02/13/2003 9:02:59 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles
Do I believe eight years is too long for a first-time offender? Yes. But being fully aware of how probation and parole work, I also understand that they will almost certainly be out in two years or less.

I hope you're right.

Statistically, it was a miracle no one was killed.

Share with us the details of your statistical analysis.

173 posted on 02/13/2003 9:14:54 AM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

To: JCEccles
Do I believe eight years is too long for a first-time offender? Yes. But being fully aware of how probation and parole work, I also understand that they will almost certainly be out in two years or less. The point is made, and a just sentence will be served. That sounds about right.

In my estimation it is the large number of teens involved that makes this an especially egregious offense. The prosecutor's recommendation might have made sense if the case had involved only a half dozen or so teens. But 60 teens? The parents might just as well have fired 60 rounds from a rifle randomly down the length of a busy interstate highway. To plead for leniency because no bullet found a target is foolish. Statistically, it was a miracle no one was killed.

Guess what -- no parole in Virginia -- you serve the full sentence. And, BTW -- how do you automatically assume, from the fact of kids drinking, that therefore they later drove, and that they drove drunk? Perhaps nobody was allowed to drive home -- maybe it was a mass sleep-over.

220 posted on 02/13/2003 2:11:59 PM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson