Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
[B]ut 'garrison' is a relative term. The work on the fort was done under the supervision of an officer from the Corps of Engineers so Army occupation was continuous.

I understand the distinction relating to "garrisoned" (by 5, 85, or 3,000), but would a single officer from the Corps of Engineers constitute a garrison?. With your military experience, if the CiC asked you to garrison a position, how many men would be placed?

25 posted on 02/14/2003 1:28:29 PM PST by 4CJ (Be nice to liberals, medicate them to the point of unconsciousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: 4ConservativeJustices
With your military experience, if the CiC asked you to garrison a position, how many men would be placed?

As many as it took. But if your definition of garrison is an armed body of men defending the fort then no, it wasn't garrisoned until December 1860. But the construction efforts were ongoing under the supervision of the Army engineers. Now, what's your point?

36 posted on 02/15/2003 4:25:27 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson