Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoughDobermann
That's not the point ... the point I was making is that the government should NOT be making laws that infringe on the usage of the public airwaves just so some company can make a buck. If a company wants to use the airwaves .... more power to them. If a company does not want people to view the content of their signal I BELIEVE it is THEIR duty to ensure that it is encrypted in such a way that an unauthorized user CAN NOT decode it. To me ... using the government to help them save a few bucks on encryption is unethical especially when it restricts me from seeing what I am being radiated with in MY own house. That use of government in that manner in my view makes the government a businss partner with the DTV industry. It is the PUBLICS airwaves and it is beamed into MY home. Passing laws that restrict my ability to view something in my home is repulsive to me.
222 posted on 02/13/2003 9:35:05 AM PST by clamper1797 (Please Do not Feed the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]


To: clamper1797
Passing laws that restrict my ability to view something in my home is repulsive to me.

Become a customer and you can watch all you want. Don't like the law? Quit whining and do something to get it changed.

224 posted on 02/13/2003 10:00:35 AM PST by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson