Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Orbiting_Rosie's_Head
I did not make an analogy; rather, I was commenting on the fallacy of another's poor analogy.

Enough of this banter. From both a legal and, more importantly, moral perspective, if one cannot see that compromising security and software in order to receive commercial programming without paying for it is theft, then there is nothing I can say beyond what I have posted on this thread to help that person achieve understanding of their malfeasance.

214 posted on 02/13/2003 9:05:25 AM PST by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: glennaro
receive commercial programming without paying for it is theft

Wrong again. Read slowly, now. If someone broadcasts electromagnetic energy into the fabric of space, it is public property, period. I don't care if you call it commercial or not. The reason this is so is because I have no say so as to whether or not I recieve it. The signal falls on me whether I like it or not. To believe that I don't I have a right to do whatever I wish with it is just plain stupid. I suppose you believe it is possible for someone to own the air just because they make noises in it and have greased a few palms in Washington. Call it commercial all you want. If it's broadcast at everyone, it belongs to everyone.

223 posted on 02/13/2003 9:59:58 AM PST by Orbiting_Rosie's_Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson