[Shooter 2.5]

Yes, except the anti's refuse to recognize what the Second Amendment means. Without a ruling to show them, they ignore it. A strict interpreter of the law will say there was never a ruling on what it does say. This is exactly what Robert was trying to point out yesterday.

Since Caifornia doesn't have a Second Amendment, the law should have pointed directly to the Federal Bill of Rights. They don't see it that way. If we get a ruling, some of the state constitutions will be unconstitutional. Texas, for one.

[Double Tap]

The conclusion that we are coming to is, unfortunately, that the rule of law is, NOT! That each individual fiefdom can make up it's own rules ignoring what is clearly written in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

That can only lead to one thing.