[rdb3]

Since we don't have that, I will have to conclude that her opinion on guns and gun rights lies in her support of the assault weapons ban.

What's "easy" is the evidence of a simple mind that I'm seeing.

Since you do not like her take on assault rifles, you extrapolate to condemn her in her entirety.

Lastly, it could also be interpreted that her decision on gun shows could include both the right to keep and bear arms and the smiting of city ordinances which go beyond their purview. You see the one, ignore the other, but are fooling no one.

T-minus 34 days until the birth of Tha SYNDICATE, the philosophical heir to William Lloyd Garrison.
101 things that the Mozilla browser can do that Internet Explorer cannot.

[Double Tap]

Nice personal attack.

But it is quite obvious who is grasping at straws to support their opinion on Janice Brown.

You see nothing, imagine every thing, and ignore the obvious.

[Shooter 2.5]

This isn't about assault weapons, gunshows or Saturday night Specials. This is about trying to find out whether a future Supreme Court Justice can support the Bill of Rights.

If she can't do that, she should be inelegible.

The Second Amendment serves as that limus test.