Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZULU
We don't know that yet. She supported gunshows when it was in the relm of her ability but she supported the assault weapons bill because California doesn't have a Second Amendment.

The only difference is getting a candidate from a state that has a Second Amendment and find out whether the candidate supported it.

All I know so far is this person is a strict interpreter of the law.
238 posted on 02/10/2003 9:14:45 AM PST by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]


To: Shooter 2.5
"We don't know that yet. She supported gunshows when it was in the relm of her ability but she supported the assault weapons bill because California doesn't have a Second Amendment."

Does California have a law against slavery???

The Bill of RIghts applies everywhere unless specifically refering to the powers of the Federal Government. The Second Amedment does not specifically refer to the federal government. I think she is a stealth liberal on this issue and I don't want her there.

The Second Amendment people helped put Bush II in office. He'd better not forget it, or he won't be re-elected. Pro-Second Amendment People should not re-elect to office politicians who seek their support, then ignore them afterwards. Rural gun states helped put Bush II over the top. If he puts an anti-gunner in the Supreme Court, he can go ask the damn Democraps for votes. As far as I'm concerned he'll never get mine again - period.
258 posted on 02/10/2003 1:58:56 PM PST by ZULU (You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson