Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother; CatoRenasci
<< Well, their surname was actually Wettin or maybe Wipper ... >>

Battenberg, maybe?
57 posted on 02/09/2003 1:24:06 AM PST by Brian Allen (This above all -- to thine own self be true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Brian Allen
Battenberg, maybe?

No, the Battenbergs were from the next castle down the road - the descendants of a morganatic marriage of the Duke of Hesse-Darmstadt.

They jump in and out of the British royal family tree too, of course. Victoria's granddaughter married Louis of Battenberg. He changed his name to Mountbatten in all the foolishness surrounding German names in WWI, and Lord Mountbatten of Burma was one of their children.

61 posted on 02/09/2003 6:51:01 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . my cats are ALL better looking than the royal family . . . smarter too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Allen
Well, Battenberg would be Charles' proper last name. His father, Phillip "Mountbatten" is a Battenberg. The family changed its name during the Great War, as did the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha which became "Windsor". I think that Wettin and Wipper are the families that constituted the House of Hanover, i.e. the first four Georges, William IV and Victoria.
63 posted on 02/10/2003 5:30:18 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Mesopotamiam Esse Delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson