To: Kevin Curry
I may not be briliant, but your bulb is dimmer than North Korea at night. To equate the idea that only Israel has any geostrategic benefit from the US launching a regional war in the Middle East with "anti-Semitism" is vicious nonsense. Iraqi WMD, if they exist, are not aimed at Peoria, but at Tel Aviv. It's a matter of simple geography.
To: Justin Raimondo
Actually biological weapons don't need missiles to be transportable. That is part of the administration's case. Do you pretend to be an expert on this matter?
81 posted on
02/08/2003 7:35:48 PM PST by
Torie
To: Justin Raimondo
"Iraqi WMD, if they exist, are not aimed at Peoria, but at Tel Aviv. It's a matter of simple geography."Are you saying it is geographically impossible (or even improbable) that Iraq would "aim" chemical, bacteriologic and dirty nuke weapons at us? That they couldn't get any of this material into the US, along with the people to set it off?
To: Justin Raimondo
Justine: Dry up and blow away. No one is really interested in your pantywaist ideas about foreign policy other than your fellow sissies.
96 posted on
02/09/2003 9:28:19 AM PST by
BlackElk
(Viva Cristo Rey!)
To: Justin Raimondo
So Justine, you've never told me how much Pravda pays you for your articles and whether they pay by the word or the pound?
Strange how Pravda is the only newspaper to publish all your articles. I'm sure they do that because of your conservative American values.
To: Justin Raimondo
Iraqi WMD, if they exist, are not aimed at Peoria, but at Tel Aviv. It's a matter of simple geography.
So... SCUDs and medium ranged missiles are the only possible way for Baghdad to deliver WMD? Geography wasn't a barrier to the attack on America on 9/11 or the earlier attempt on the twin towers.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson