Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
The Challenger explosion in 1986 ended the myth of low-risk flight. The loss of the Columbia exposes the vulnerability of the shuttle's defining feature: the ability to glide safely to Earth, to come back and be reused time and again.

As I recall, the Orbiter has flown some 113 times with two (that's 2) fatal mishaps. In the entire history of the US space program, we have had three fatal disasters, resulting in the deaths of 17 personnel. By contrast, how many missions have demonstrated the POSSIBILITY of space flight? How many have SUCCESSFULLY returned to Earth and been reused?

As usual, succeed and no one knows your name. Only failure is written large to some people.

3 posted on 02/08/2003 7:51:50 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack
"As usual, succeed and no one knows your name. Only failure is written large to some people. "

With all of the shuttle bashing taking place, your is a refreshing post. Even though I have been contradicted many times, I still insist that the shuttle is an engineering marvel. It is expensive, dangerous, and unwieldy in some respects but a marvel nonetheless. Having said that, the future does not reside in the shuttle. I hope this tragedy serves as a catalyst to move us on to the next generation of vehicles.

15 posted on 02/08/2003 11:07:57 AM PST by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack
As I recall, the Orbiter has flown some 113 times with two (that's 2) fatal mishaps.

113 times with two mishaps, producing 14 fatalities. That works out to one fatality for every 8 trips.

That said, the early voyages of exploration and early American colonization also had a high fatality rate. The final reward, though, was high, and now transatlantic travel is very safe. I do think, though, that the days of sending up schoolteachers, etc as publicity stunts are over. The space program will be (more accurately) looked at as a game for risk-accepting test-pilot types.

It's also well past time to retire the Shuttle and develop something better, using the lessons learned, and not repeating the mistakes made, in the shuttle program

26 posted on 02/08/2003 4:26:03 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (To see the ultimate evil, visit the Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson