Replies

Well,Gael,if it wasn`t you,I would perform coup de grace!Damn!

But,your apeal on humanitarian basis I can not refuse,on the basis of my profession!LOOOOOOOOL!

Call the fork-lift to drag that fat carcas away!It stinks.

Gael,one does not slaughter fools,they commit suicide!Featherweights shouldn`t fight Tyson.

Now,a question for you guys:I checked a couple of articles in Washington Times from this Kuhner caracter.He is unbelieveable:Tudjman couldn`t write beter.Did you read anything from him before?

PS.Correction:Featherweights shouldn`t fight Tyson and Mohamad Ali(Kosta)!

Kuhner is correct in his view that the Hague is a sham, and is an inquisition to make both the Serbs and Croatians bend down in favour of the international powers.

Kuhner is also correct that the State Dep't has installed pliant former communists in both Belgrade and Zagreb to do the West's bidding.

Kuhner's opinions are based on solid foundations.

I suggest that both Croatians and Serbians take the advice and set aside their differences and concentrate more on the twin threats of Islamic extremism from Bosnia, and Western meddling in their local affairs.

With the world focused on the Middle East, now is the time.

Thing is, both Djindjic and Racan need to be given the heave-ho so that honourable conservatives like Kostunica and Pasalic, and not communist apparatchiks, be given the reigns of power to effectively deal with Saudi-backed Islamic incursions in Middle Bosnia.

Clinton's meddling was quite damaging in the Balkans, and Tudjman and Milosevic could only do so much.

Maybe the new generation can focus on the task while the world's view is averted.

be seeing you,

foreign policy wonk

post 0049

Kuhner is an assistant editor on the WashTimes' editorial page, which might help explain the paper's anti-Serb slant. He's written a number of times about why the ICTY's investigations of Croat generals might lead to indictments there of Clinton (like that's a bad thing) under a "command responsibility" theory.