Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aruanan; Caleb1411; expatpat; toenail; Dialup Llama; Loyalist; RightWhale
by your definition, anything that one does or any manner in which one must behave to obtain what he wants is "overpopulation"

No. Not anything.

Look around: All life seems designed to pursue its means of sustenance. No animals are too lazy to feed themselves.

Neither is man lazy to provide for himself; man only seeks to avoid behavior that is contrary to his nature.

When people are accused of being lazy for evading work or school--is it becaues they are lying down sleeping, or are they found expending great amounts of energy doing things they enjoy?

People are by nature designed to love living a certain kind of life--a kind of life which we can no longer live because of overpopulation.

Now many sit at desks all day doing drudgery, only to be told that after work they must jog in circles (to simulate a days work hunting and gathering) lest they die of heart disease.

We now must do the work of civilized man to earn food and still do the work of hunter-gatherers to earn our health.

Modern man must work two shifts, and in ways most uncomfortable--jogging in circles is not the same as the endorphin eased exhilaration of real hunting.

52 posted on 02/08/2003 9:59:41 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Age of Reason
Where do you live: city, suburb, country, boondocks?
57 posted on 02/09/2003 8:15:51 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson