Skip to comments.
THE STEPFORD DEMOCRATS Hillary's PAC a Presidential Committee-in-Waiting (backstory)
NewsMax.com ^
| Thursday, May 9, 2002
| Dave Eberhart
Posted on 02/07/2003 1:08:00 PM PST by Liz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Liz
I know -- the weasel RAT corporate donors are having a hard time which I think is a riot.
Even Ted Turner doesn't have enough money to buy back CNN because he lost so much on AOL!
Gotta love it!
21
posted on
02/07/2003 3:28:13 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: Michael.SF.
I love it!!! That would be the perfect ad!
I agree with you on this article BTW! Not to mention I don't think raising $1.3 million is a lot for a PAC.
22
posted on
02/07/2003 3:30:08 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: PhiKapMom; Petronski
It's what you call "schadenfreud."
23
posted on
02/07/2003 4:16:53 PM PST
by
Liz
To: PhiKapMom
The Stepford wives image sounds like a good freeping tool. Arrive at her every appearance dressed as the stepford wives and acting like robots.
24
posted on
02/07/2003 4:18:31 PM PST
by
WVNan
To: Michael.SF.; Verginius Rufus
When I made posted the thread, I made a specific point to add "as of May 2002" at a couple places in the article so as to alert posters to the timeline.
25
posted on
02/07/2003 4:20:25 PM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
You did, I missed the real significance of the (as of May 2002), I thought that the records were only reported up to that date, based on the information the writer had.
I still think that Newsmax was trying to make a big issue out of a minor one.
I did not mean to imply in any way that I thought you were wrong to post the article.
To: Michael.SF.
You may have noticed I also added "backstory" to the header to indicate the story was backdated.
I thought the story was relevant since (1) Hitlery's possible prez run is being discussed and knowing how she intends to finance the race is crucial to evaluating her chances; and,
(2) b/c HILPAC is supposed to be her stepping stone to bigger and better things by funding winning Dummycraps.
Knowing she's backed a bunch of losers is a good thing.
27
posted on
02/07/2003 4:53:09 PM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
28
posted on
02/08/2003 4:42:19 AM PST
by
NYpeanut
To: The Wizard
this thing will never be presidentTrue. But you wouldn't believe the number of tinfoilers around here who believe the inevitability of "President Hillary" has already been set down as gospel by God himself.
29
posted on
02/08/2003 4:44:24 AM PST
by
Timesink
(My name's Harley Earl, and I've come back to build you a great tampon.)
To: Timesink
True. But you wouldn't believe the number of tinfoilers around here who believe the inevitability of "President Hillary" has already been set down as gospel by God himself.Don't you be callin me no tin-foiler boy! I don't like that conotation.
HRC will be given the VP spot in 2004. If Kerry flounders, she'll go whole hog. Drafted at the convention in Boston!
30
posted on
02/08/2003 5:06:55 AM PST
by
johnny7
(FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT!)
To: Liz
Clinton's leadership PAC should not be confused with her election PAC, which has attracted about $31 million since 1997 and is now down to about $150,000, according to the last report filed with the Federal Election Commission. 1997? Is that correct? Why did she have an election PAC in '97? She wasn't "drafted" to run for the senate until the 1999 post impeachment sympathy factor was there.
31
posted on
02/08/2003 5:33:13 AM PST
by
NEPA
To: NEPA
Hitlery (and Bill) have never had an unscripted moment in their lives. They plotted and planned their political assault on America from the getgo. Their cunning political instincts have served them well. The mind-numbed Stepford Democrats are the only creatures who still don't get it.
32
posted on
02/08/2003 5:38:31 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
Thanks, saw that earlier. The Rat donors are tapped out and, with the GOP in control, there is little return to be expected on their donations. Life is so much better since W was elected. Hehehehe.....
33
posted on
02/12/2003 8:48:48 AM PST
by
eureka!
(The Lamestream Presstitutes are not an honest bunch, are they?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson