Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dominic Harr
Your use of the term *clearly* showed bias.

Well, that's your opinion: Which is wrong.

when I pointed out the thread would degenerate into pro-WOD folks ignoring obvious evidence you said you'd not seen that

I misunderstood your post then, Because on that point we agree. BOTH SIDES routinely ignore evidence which assails their point of view.

And now Mr. Paulsen proves me right, and you wrong.

Wrong again. Read more carefully and you will see this thread has panned out exactly as I said it would. All WOD threads do.

95 posted on 02/07/2003 3:36:42 PM PST by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Skooz
Well, that's your opinion: Which is wrong.

As the one inside your skull, you'd be the last one to recognize your own bias. Your choice of words betrayed your true feelings.

And this thread has *not* gone even remotely as you had said. I don't see the anti-wod side ignoring anything, in one single post. You suggesting they have likewise betrays more about your inner thoughts than you'd like to admit.

Whatever, I don't care, I'm just a master of pointing out the obvious. I'm done with this discussion. I'm off to dinner with the wife.

97 posted on 02/07/2003 3:42:53 PM PST by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson