She has some insights but I don't agree w/ her.
1 posted on
02/07/2003 4:42:56 AM PST by
dennisw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: dennisw
2 posted on
02/07/2003 4:44:56 AM PST by
dennisw
( http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
To: dennisw
"Above all, we need moderate Muslims to turn out the homicidal fanatics in their midst."
I need to win the lottery, too, but I don't plan my life as if it will happen.
Nonetheless, Paglia is always worth listening to, disagree with her though I might.
3 posted on
02/07/2003 4:56:03 AM PST by
Uncle Fud
To: dennisw
I really enjoy reading Paglia, and I think she's a refreshing voice among the current intelligentsia, which is why her opposition is disappointing.
What I'm going to be looking at with a keen eye is the number of civilian casualties. Like most of the anti-war people, Paglia envisions carpet bombing of civilian structures. I just don't see that happening. We don't have to necessarily "take" Baghdad through street fighting and aerial assaults. One strategy I have read is to surround the city and choke off its supplies. Any Iraqi regulars looking to fight in the streets might not have anyone to shoot at.
6 posted on
02/07/2003 5:11:37 AM PST by
Mr. Bird
To: dennisw
Yes, but who's going to take over Arabia -- the strongest alternative is the radical Muslims. What if Egypt goes? The dream of the radical Islamic movement is to topple all of the secular, pro-West governments in the Middle East. Americans may say, "Oh, that can never happen." Well, yes it can -- because of the discipline and rigor of these radical, self-contained belief systems.
She nailed that part. The "radical Islamic movement", like the commie Chinese, realize that their strong suite is time. They don't care if it takes 10, 15, 50 or 100 years, they'll keep chipping away until they topple the US & Israel.
7 posted on
02/07/2003 5:11:46 AM PST by
csvset
To: dennisw
I'm absolutely appalled at the lack of acknowledgment of the cost to ordinary Iraqi citizens of any incursion by us What about the cost to the Iraqi people of not taking out Saddam, and letting them continue to die in his oppressive dictatorship?
9 posted on
02/07/2003 5:16:40 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(This space intentionally blank)
To: dennisw
Is it just me, or is she sounding more 'middle of the road' lately?
10 posted on
02/07/2003 5:23:26 AM PST by
Chad Fairbanks
('I WISH, at some point, that you would address those damned armadillos in your trousers." - JustShe)
To: dennisw
Omens! Why doesn't she just go slit open a chicken and examine its innards? This worked for generations of pagans...
However, while she also had a lot of other statements that were pretty dubious, she seemed a good deal more responsible and thoughtful than many of her ilk. As for the simplistic statement that at the end of a war, "no one remembers what they were fighting for," I guess she's forgotten about tiny details such as the end of slavery. Remarks like that make good liberal poetry, but have no basis in reality.
11 posted on
02/07/2003 5:24:40 AM PST by
livius
To: dennisw
Thanks for an interesting post.
I mostly agree with her, but definitely can't agree with her on the "omen" thing. At most, it may serve as a reminder that the war might not be as easy as many people expect it to be.
I guess I'm just not a believer in omens. If I hid under my bed every time something bad happened I'd be living under there permanently.
12 posted on
02/07/2003 5:26:30 AM PST by
alpowolf
To: dennisw
Camille Paglia is always an interesting read, whether one agrees with her or not...
and, in this case, I'm sorry to say that I do most strenuously disagree with her.
13 posted on
02/07/2003 5:27:33 AM PST by
BlueLancer
(Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængruppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
To: dennisw
Do they think the American people are fools? No, they think you are. And they're right.
15 posted on
02/07/2003 5:48:05 AM PST by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: dennisw
"Paglia retired her Salon column last year to focus on teaching..."
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Well, that's ONE way of putting it. Another way is that "we can't pay you anymore because Salon is a pathetic sinking ship. Would you still write for us for free?"
Salon started out with such promise, and then melted into such a mud puddle of slime.
To: dennisw
OK, boys and girls, how many mutually exclusive assertions and arguments can
you find?
Saddam can be bottled up with aggressive surveillance and pinpoint airstrikes on military installations.
Are we going to bomb laboratories and facilities storing dangerous chemicals and release them in the air near population centers? Are we going to poison Baghdad? This is as barbarous as what we're opposing in Saddam.I'm not sure [Condoleezza Rice] has the touch and finesse that are needed for international relations
One of the great moments in American politics would be if Cheney is out as V.P. the next time around, and Bush puts [Condoleezza] Rice -- a black woman -- on the ticket.
18 posted on
02/07/2003 6:14:37 AM PST by
steve-b
To: dennisw
Camille should stick to writing about poetry henceforth, and leave war to the menfolk. She is completely clueless.
19 posted on
02/07/2003 6:15:45 AM PST by
The Great Satan
(Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
To: dennisw
re: Including one small town where the debris fell called Palestine, Texas.)))
Heck, we've also got a Paris, a Troy....some probably fell on Crawford. And what ponderous premonition can you portend from Waco?
Good grief, Camille. What muddling drivel. No wonder you've been quiet for so long, and I can't believe how often I searched the net to see what you were writing... Clearly, you've run out of anything interesting to say. Better stick to the university where the demands are low.
20 posted on
02/07/2003 6:18:04 AM PST by
Mamzelle
To: dennisw
"However, I'm extremely upset about our rush to war at the present moment. If there truly were an authentic international coalition that had been carefully built, and if the administration had demonstrated sensitivity to the fragility of international relations, I'd be 100 percent in favor of an allied military expedition to go into Iraq and find and dispose of all weapons of mass destruction."
Sorry dear we don't have the time to play slap and tickle with the pacifists this time around
21 posted on
02/07/2003 6:19:21 AM PST by
linn37
(work my fingers to the bone and what do I get?)
To: dennisw
Salon, now at $0.05 per share
To: dennisw
I'm a big Paglia fan...sharp, graceful, mostly honest dyke that she is.
However, I found this interview with her unreadable...just don't have time for flat-earthers these days...soon as someone tells me the earth is flat (repeating any Dimokrat talking point), I turn 'em off.
25 posted on
02/07/2003 7:51:29 AM PST by
jwfiv
To: dennisw
She misses the bigger point-- that 'sovereign nations' are now an anachronism.
The Arab states have no particular moral right to exist as sovereign nations.
It's time for the 'breaking of nations'.
To: dennisw
Good work, dennis. I sure as hell wasn't going to pay Salon to read this.
27 posted on
02/07/2003 12:06:30 PM PST by
beckett
To: dennisw
After 9/11, what should have been perfectly clear is that we need a long, slow process of reeducating the peoples of the world, to try to convince Muslims of the fundamental benevolence of American intentions. What 9/11 made perfectly clear is that there is no time for that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson