Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
When did Dr. Kervorkian become NASA director? You should, we should all, have higher standards -- it would be a cheaper space expolration if we just handed the astronauts a 10 shot revolver with nine empty chambers, and a good personal telescope and camera. That'd be better safety than NASCAR too, I guess. And about the same science results.

As my friend anarcho-libertarian "Wild Bill" says ... "Hey if it [the shuttle] was military, I'd be 100% for it." He's right, such risks might be acceptable to acheive a military goal, in in the framework of a (theoretically) higher military accountability. Practically the shuttle is not only lousy for science, not only "jams the channel" for space-enterprise both public and private, but would be a ultra-lousy military platform too.

NASA has NO institutional common sense to even continue with it. You'll notice the military has run away from it, some years back. Thankfully!

145 posted on 02/07/2003 8:55:20 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
Practically the shuttle is not only lousy for science, not only "jams the channel" for space-enterprise both public and private, but would be a ultra-lousy military platform too.

This was the first "science mission" in over two years.

163 posted on 02/07/2003 9:22:12 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson