Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightOnline
Take something that large and as hard as a brick......slam it into ceramic tiling at that speed..........and you have damage, folks. Severe damage.

The foam was much lighter, and much more brittle, than a single brick that is about a tenth the size of the chunk that fell off, and it hit a glancing blow. I don't think it's a valid comparison.

136 posted on 02/07/2003 8:49:08 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb; XBob
The foam was much lighter, and much more brittle, than a single brick that is about a tenth the size of the chunk that fell off, and it hit a glancing blow. I don't think it's a valid comparison.

One thing of interest: XBob posted a loop of pictures that I would interpret as showing the object fluttering outward (and a second object appearing, then disappearing), then swinging back towards the shuttle. I would expect foam to be blown almost straight back, but perhaps ice would have given it the inertia to be carried along more. This would result in a strike of less energy, as the relative speed would be lower, but at a more perpendicular angle. Thus a smaller, but deeper impact.

Either there is lateral motion, or the object at one point is moving FORWARD relative to the motion of the Orbiter.

157 posted on 02/07/2003 9:16:45 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb
Could be right, but this is exactly how it was described by Rush's guest host earlier this week.
158 posted on 02/07/2003 9:17:17 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson