Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
>>...High-resolution images taken from a ground-based Air Force tracking camera...<<
>>...show serious structural damage to the inboard leading edge...<<
>>...They also show the orbiter's right aft yaw thrusters firing...<<
>>...Columbia's fuselage and right wing appear normal..<<
Hmmm...the camera can see both wings, the yaw thrusters AND the fuselage...does this sound like a GROUND BASED CAMERA???
To: The Magical Mischief Tour; All
As I now understand it, the piece of "foam" that peeled off and struck the left wing during the launch phase was the size of a fairly large suitcase and
as hard as a brick. Now............does anyone here know what speed the launch vehicle would have attained at 80 seconds into flight? I'm betting.........pretty damned fast.
Take something that large and as hard as a brick......slam it into ceramic tiling at that speed..........and you have damage, folks. Severe damage.
To: Indy Pendance; XBob; Lessismore; chimera; Dark Wing
This is the original, detailed, story.
101 posted on
02/07/2003 7:47:11 AM PST by
Thud
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
The ragged edge on the left leading edge, indicates that either a small structural breach -- such as a crack -- occurred, allowing the 2,500F reentry heating to erode additional structure there, or that a small portion of the leading edge fell off at that location. NASA: "We will continue to focus on the things we cannot see." /sarcasm
103 posted on
02/07/2003 7:50:18 AM PST by
cinFLA
To: XBob; Gracey
FYI
117 posted on
02/07/2003 8:23:18 AM PST by
lepton
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
"the tank debris event at launch played a key role in the root cause of the accident"
If this event is proven true - I predict the envirowhackos WILL BE PUT OUT OF BUSINESS. To protect the environment at the cost of 7 people is waaaaaaay too high a price to pay.
I cannot believe that the amount of Freon previously used for the shuttle was significant enough to cause damage to the environment.
128 posted on
02/07/2003 8:41:23 AM PST by
CyberAnt
( Yo! Syracuse)
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
A source within local law enforcement circles said this week that even though NASA and others want to collect all debris and parts to aid in the investigation the the search is also continuing for two boxes that had military and defense applications. This on local news close to the debris search.
138 posted on
02/07/2003 8:50:32 AM PST by
lonestar
(Don't mess with Texans)
To: the_doc
Bump!
159 posted on
02/07/2003 9:17:30 AM PST by
CCWoody
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Marking to read.
173 posted on
02/07/2003 9:34:41 AM PST by
abner
(Cruise the Caribe with FReepers! FRN Network Cruise)
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Amazing post BUMP
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
anyone have a web page I could upload some pics to so I could link them here?
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Doe anyone have a hard time line re: Time from the last verbal comm from Columia, until vehicle was seen breaking up over Dallas area?
199 posted on
02/07/2003 10:44:59 AM PST by
MindBender26
(.....and for more news as it happens...stay tuned to your local FReeper station....)
To: Boot Hill
High-resolution images taken from a ground-based Air Force tracking camera in southwestern U.S. show serious structural damage to the inboard leading edge of Columbia's left wing, as the crippled orbiter flew overhead about 60 sec. before the vehicle broke up over Texas killing the seven astronauts on board Feb. 1. FYI
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
I'd sure like to see these images. Let's hope they are released soon.
223 posted on
02/07/2003 12:20:37 PM PST by
Fury
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Given the detailed telemetry concerning flight control surface and rocket firings to correct the reentry attitude, I wonder if NASA has reported if any unusual attitude corrections were noted after the foam impact after launch.
233 posted on
02/07/2003 1:11:13 PM PST by
ampat
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Are they gonna show us the pic referred to? Or am I just blind?
259 posted on
02/07/2003 3:06:42 PM PST by
Terriergal
(Matthew 23:24 "You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel. ")
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Better put this photo on this thread since it's already on another one:
264 posted on
02/07/2003 3:27:38 PM PST by
Brett66
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
I guess I must be blind - but they coulda pointed out just what on the pic we were looking at. It's not like it's all that obvious for us laypeople!
289 posted on
02/08/2003 7:04:51 AM PST by
Terriergal
(Matthew 23:24 "You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel. ")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson