To: madg
My oh my, we have a bona fide GLSEN/NAMBLA paid shill here, obsessed with wiretap laws only. It's good to know you're such an upstanding Ammurrican citizen, such a champeen of the rule of law, that psychological coercion by Perverts against young malleable minds, that abuse of power by older "adults" should never bring the wiretap laws into question. Why let the psyches of youth who look to adults for protection get in the way of common sense, right?
Apparently there's no law on the books about corrupting minors either. What's that, you say? There ARE? Then make your mind which is the priority-someone breaking a wiretap law or the spirit of a child.
To: JoJo Gunn
Does the end justify the means?
Should conservatives break the law in order to expose a disgusting behavior?
Even if breaking the law was the only avenue available to shine a light on this darkness, was it necessary being so upfront about breaking the law?
Im having a hard time making my mind about this article. If I had decided to make illegal, surreptitious recordings, I would have send the tape to a friendly reporter anonimously .
Being so blatant about breaking the law, these conservative parents have reduced the effectiveness of their message.
80 posted on
02/07/2003 4:19:40 PM PST by
LO_IQ
To: JoJo Gunn; madg
Then make your mind which is the priority-someone breaking a wiretap law or the spirit of a child. Magd defends the indefensible. He is an enemy of children.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson