EdReform: "The fact that the presenters and sponsors admit that they acted as private individuals and as a private organization, at a private conference and not as a "bona fide school, museum or library, or acting in the course of his employment as an employee of such organization," would imply that they have no defense under sections 28 and 29."
Madg: "I have already pointed out that the material would not be considered “harmful” under the definitions in section 31; therefore there was no violation, therefore the presenters do not need a “defense.”
In reply 104, you stated:
"*- (3) lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value for minors. Obviously, there was a great deal of scientific value to the presentation. Therefore, the material was not “harmful” under the law."
Do you actually believe that instructing kids on how to properly shape a fist for insertion into an anus has scientific value?