Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve-b
BINGO!

The question is how. Hard, or easy...
54 posted on 02/07/2003 11:42:55 AM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: null and void
Barring attempts by the government to "engineer national policy" (i.e. f*** up everything), population will (like most natural phenomena) oscillate around an equilibrium -- people have few children for a while, land and housing get real cheap, people start having more kids, livable regions get annoyingly crowded, people start having fewer kids,... and round and round the cycle goes.

Ehrlich would look at a patient catching a fever and predict spontaneous human combustion. London would look at a patient recovering from a fever and predict a corpsicle.

56 posted on 02/07/2003 11:50:04 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
The question is how. Hard, or easy...

It'll seek out its own level, and there are already signs of that happening - the birthrate in Mexico, for example, has dropped significantly in recent years. But it's demented to wish painful death of five billion people because the poster in questions wants more lebensraum.

64 posted on 02/07/2003 12:32:29 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson