Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let’s quit the UN
The Spectator ^ | Feb. 8, 2003 (Advance Copy) | Mark Steyn

Posted on 02/06/2003 7:04:43 AM PST by conservativecorner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
Great commentary concerning the UN and the USA!!
1 posted on 02/06/2003 7:04:43 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Steyn BUMP!
2 posted on 02/06/2003 7:21:52 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
I've been saying for years that we sould (1) withdraw from the UN, and (2) demand that the UN find a more suitable location for their operations. The events of the past 12 years have done nothing but bolster my opinion on this.

After the fabulous presentation given by Colin Powell yesterday, I watched and listened to the comments given by the members of the Security Council. There was nothing surprising in any of the comments made by the French, the Germans, or the Syrians.

I have already contacted the offices of my Congressman (Tom DeLay) and bothe on my Senators (Kay Bailey Hutchinson and John Cornyn) to express my views. I strongly recommend that everyone do the same.

The UN has demonstrated time and again that they are nothing more than a playground for Anti-American socialists that have no interest other than aquiring power and money for their own benefit.

The sooner that the UN is disolved, the better.
3 posted on 02/06/2003 7:22:23 AM PST by Howie66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howie66
"When I first saw it, circa 1990, [referring to the "Get the US out of the UN" sign} I believe I gave a wry chuckle positively Pattenesque in its amused sophistication: to be sure, the UN contains its share of rum coves but no serious person would entertain the notion of US withdrawal. Now I think he’s dead right"

This precisely describes the path I have taken. And we need to get the UN out of the US.
4 posted on 02/06/2003 7:29:55 AM PST by Bahbah (Pray for our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner; Pokey78
bump
5 posted on 02/06/2003 7:36:49 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
This precisely describes the path I have taken.

Agreed, sir.

6 posted on 02/06/2003 7:41:31 AM PST by Snake65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
"So I say: go ahead, Jacques, make my day. Wield your veto, and let the Texan cowboy and his ever-expanding posse go it ‘alone’."

Bump!

7 posted on 02/06/2003 8:49:27 AM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
He has put his finger on it. UN approval for the war will be relatively simple to get. Its simply a matter of mortgaging are assets to French interest.

But how is a vote purchased with the Iraqi peoples' treasure more moral than a simple decision taken by elected US leadership, taking into account the interests of this country and the region?

We have been warning the UN that if they unable to respond to Iraq's defiance of their own resolutions, they will wake up to find themselves irrelevant. But let them sleep... they are already irrelevant. They already are unable to respond. The only UN decisions that are enforced are the ones we choose to enforce. The others simply hang in the air like an unanswered question.

The UN is a collection of mostly statist and socialist countries that could in no way be construed as sharing our values. We should never allow ourselves to be yoked to such a crowd as this. This does not mean we should never act in concert with other countries; we almost always do partner with others. But the partnerships are real ones, based on shared interests, and shared values. And they are always partnerships which arise naturally, owing nothing to our respective UN memberships.

Steyn has it about right. The UN is already finished. They have already been pants'ed, and there is nothing left to the imagination. But we have lost nothing, really, except an illusion. The real alliances we still have just as we have always had them. The countries that are willing to face a bullet for us, are willing for reasons having nothing to do with the UN. The others who offer help less publicly, at the level of law enforcement, likewise do so for reasons unrelated to the UN.

We will get by without it. The age of multilateralism will not disappear with the death of the UN, but the multilateral bodies that arise will be "organic", they will arise in response to a specific need, and will therefore be real. The UN is a fantasy. However fond some of us may have been, it was never real.
8 posted on 02/06/2003 9:02:19 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes; Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; ...
Thanks!


9 posted on 02/06/2003 9:03:56 AM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marron
"mortgaging are assets " = "mortgaging Iraqi assets"

dang.
10 posted on 02/06/2003 9:04:00 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Let’s quit the UN

I didn't even have to read the article. My answer is Yes.

11 posted on 02/06/2003 9:05:13 AM PST by Terriergal (Matthew 23:24 "You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Quit the Unimportant Nations? Surely you can't be serious.
12 posted on 02/06/2003 9:06:41 AM PST by Redcloak (Jøin the Cøälition tø Prevent Unnecessärily Verbøse änd Nønsensicäl Täg Lines, eh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

13 posted on 02/06/2003 9:08:07 AM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howie66
I would like us to make sure the UN is dissolved, rather than see it continue on without us from its new HQ in Berlin or Beijing.
14 posted on 02/06/2003 9:09:14 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
There were many woozy Western liberals who felt — and still feel — that the theoretical idealism of communism excused all its terrible failures in practice. The UN gets a similar pass but from a far larger number of people. How else to explain all those polls in Britain, Australia and even America that show popular support for war contingent on UN approval? ‘The UN’ means the Security Council; ‘the Security Council’ is a negative — it means anything which doesn’t prompt France, Russia or China to use their vetoes. I mentioned a few months back those Anglican churchmen who’ve redefined the Christian concept of a ‘just war’ to mean only one sanctioned by the UN, and said I couldn’t see why it should be left to two atheists and a lapsed Catholic to decide whether this is a war Christians could support. But amazingly the Anglican position has now been embraced by huge majorities of the British, Australian and American peoples: only the UN can confer moral respectability on the war.

Huge Steyn Bump.

I have pondered this very point over and over again in recent months. Why this fetish of moral authority at the hands of the UN? This body of mostly thugs and kleptocratic swags?

Whatever the UN is spending on PR it is getting all of its money's worth. Never before has there been such a disconnect between the image and the reality of an institution.

15 posted on 02/06/2003 9:18:31 AM PST by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Lack of funding would dissolve it quickly enough, I think. Not to mention the amazing amount of infighting that would take place in the post-US vacuum.
16 posted on 02/06/2003 9:20:28 AM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
The UN is nothing less than the skeleton structure of the New World Order. That's all it is. Katie, thus, is a useful tool for the socialist/communist/dictatorial LEFT!!!
17 posted on 02/06/2003 9:21:30 AM PST by YoungKentuckyConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungKentuckyConservative
glad to see you talking about the New World Order, my fellow Kentuckian.

Get the U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S.

18 posted on 02/06/2003 9:25:24 AM PST by RonPaulLives (Virgil Moore/Don Bell For Kentucky 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner; MadIvan
the Anglo-Aussie-American relationship

The "Triple A"! I just might be able to warm up to that!

19 posted on 02/06/2003 9:25:40 AM PST by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense; lawgirl; DJ88; goodnesswins; GretchenEE; Howlin; Republic; twyn1; Mo1; gramho12; ...
A Steyn ping!

I'm firmly in the US OUT OF THE UN camp.

20 posted on 02/06/2003 9:37:07 AM PST by Wphile (President Bush is a man of character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson