Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Miss Marple
I'm not following. Exam for what?
8 posted on 02/06/2003 7:07:21 AM PST by Queen of Excelsior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Queen of Excelsior
We idn't hire any new Foreign Service Officers.
11 posted on 02/06/2003 7:08:20 AM PST by txradioguy (Doing my part to keep the country free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Queen of Excelsior
I'm not following. Exam for what?

For foreign service.

He stated that recently they have accepted a record number of applicants that could be compared to any previous year and one could see how eager so many are to aid our country.

He said this was due to stepping up recruitment efforts and getting the word out. Then he said he was outraged to learn that in the nineties this effort wasn't made and some years the test was not even offered.

He explained that if we want able staff to replace outgoing personnel this must be a continous effort.

15 posted on 02/06/2003 7:10:57 AM PST by cyncooper (God be with President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Queen of Excelsior
He was talking about how understaffed the State Department is. He was referring to the new hire of foreign service officers and the foreign service exam.

He compared it to the military failing to have any new junior officers in the chain. AND he DEFINITELY said "for several years in the 1990's."

SLAM! Go Colin!!

17 posted on 02/06/2003 7:11:14 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson