To: blondee123
yes, I see that is one weak point of how he can't handle the people. Police yes, but camaras and mic in his face, nooooooo! Especially when they yell the truth... Was it John and Ken?...lol..
To: All
Like some of you, I too have SOME faith that the National Enquirer can be right at times. Mine is based on some really dead-on reports they had about some details of the Lewinsky saga.
I wouldn't hesitate to buy a NE, or to read one. It's just that it seems in our area, our NE's are always a week behind everywhere else! Pathetic--how are people like me supposed to keep up, lol?
It is maddening, however, that they seem to come up wrong about as often as they come up right. Furthermore, many of their more titillating stories have been dead-ends, throwing out information that caused me to wait to hear more--and to never hear one word more.
I'm still waiting to hear anything whatsoever to indicate either the truth or falsehood of the Nat'l. Enquirer's allegation that Ed and Tom Smart of SLC owned and/or operated a male escort service--and it's been the better part of a year since the NE dropped that one.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson