Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator: Concerned Columbia Crew took Pictures of Damaged Left Wing
Florida Today.com ^ | Februrary 5, 2003 1:20PM | Staff Wire Report

Posted on 02/05/2003 1:23:55 PM PST by ewing

Crew members of the Space Shuttle Columbia were concerned about the orbiter's damaged left wing according to United States Senator George Allen. (Republican-Virginia)

One of the crew members, Mission Specialist David Brown, sent e-mail messages to his brother Doug during the mission, Allen said. In those e-mails, David Brown said that the crew took pictures of the left wing because they were concerned about it, Allen said.

The Senator was only repeating information he recieved from Doug Brown, said his spokeswoman, Carrie Cantrell. There was no phone listing for Doug Brown's home in Arlington and he could not be reached today.

A 2 and one half pound chunk of insulation foam struck the underside of the wing during lifoff as the shuttle sped upwards of 1,900 MPH last month. At the time NASA officials did not think the damage would be a problem, but the agency is now investigating the wing as a possible reason that Columbia shattered on re-entry into Earth's atmosphere on Saturday.

(Excerpt) Read more at floridatoday.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Texas; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: columbia; feb12003; georgeallen; michaeldobbs; nasa; pictures; senator; sts107; wing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-203 next last
To: Mo1
Are the cracks in it for real?
61 posted on 02/05/2003 1:52:01 PM PST by DittoJed2 (Rejoice in the Lord always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
I don't think the AP writer really wanted to use the word "eluded." He probably was thinking about "alluded"

Hey, they sound almost the same. What's the big deal? Sort've like affect and effect -- who really knows? (Sarcasm, of course).

62 posted on 02/05/2003 1:52:04 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
bttt
63 posted on 02/05/2003 1:52:48 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cooter
The crew was asked to photograph the external tank upon separation.

Something they do just about every mission.

64 posted on 02/05/2003 1:52:57 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Shot of cargo bay door...officially off radar for relevance.
65 posted on 02/05/2003 1:53:08 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Did they have the robot arm out on this mission?

No.

66 posted on 02/05/2003 1:53:12 PM PST by Denver Ditdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
This "information" is most likely false.

Read my post more carefully.

""Now lets see the images if they exist,""

67 posted on 02/05/2003 1:55:23 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
That is NOT the wing .. and doesn't have anything to do with the problems the shuttle had as far as I can tell of everything I've read
68 posted on 02/05/2003 1:55:49 PM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Allen only briefly eluded to the astronauts’ concerns in a longer speech Tuesday that memorialized David Brown, a Virginia native

Actually I'll bet he never proofread his article either. this error would have gotten past a grammar and spellcheck in Office.

The machine is an adjunct for your thought processes; not a replacement folks.

69 posted on 02/05/2003 1:56:19 PM PST by Centurion2000 (The question is not whether you're paranoid, but whether you're paranoid enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; Poohbah
Did they have the robot arm out on this mission?

Poohbah assured me that the Canadian (?) arm was not on board this mission.

70 posted on 02/05/2003 1:58:17 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
If this US Senator produces the picture of the cargo bay wall with a stovepipe hat, I'll just have to laugh myself silly.

Yes...people come up with so many hoaxes and paraniod sounding conspiracy theories after disasters it gets predictable.

Remember that photo of the guy on top of the WTC with the jet coming straight at him? Too many kooks with too much time on their hands.

71 posted on 02/05/2003 1:58:40 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Denver Ditdat; Boot Hill
Did they have the robot arm out on this mission?

No.

Thank you. Then it's doubtful that the crew got a photo without going EVA. I don't think that there's a ground tracking camera with that kind of resoultion.

72 posted on 02/05/2003 2:00:41 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Read my post more carefully. ""Now lets see the images if they exist,""

The stunning information would be that they were concerned and taking pictures at all -- not whether they had pics in-hand.

This is the first and only comment I've seen anywhere about this. Like I said, it stinks to high heaven.

73 posted on 02/05/2003 2:01:14 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Are the cracks in it for real?

I grabbed the pict from the thread of the other day and was able to add cracks via Photoshop without too much effort.

I even cleaned up the blue of the earth that sloppily spills onto the wing surface.... that's what troubled me when I first saw the pict.
74 posted on 02/05/2003 2:01:21 PM PST by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Well the original article said it was a wing:http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.corriere.it%2FPrimo_Piano%2FCronache%2F2003%2F02_Febbraio%2F03%2Fcrepe.shtml&langpair=it%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&prev=%2Flanguage_tools">Original
75 posted on 02/05/2003 2:01:44 PM PST by DittoJed2 (Rejoice in the Lord always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2; Howlin
Trust me .. It is NOT the wing

Hey Howlin do you have a link to the thread that proved this picture is not the wing and is really the cargo bay?
76 posted on 02/05/2003 2:03:36 PM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Got a feeling this is phoney. I believe NASA said there is no way the astronauts could view the damage. And why would they send a message to home rather than NASA.

DITTO...they could not even see under wing, let alone take pics of it!!

77 posted on 02/05/2003 2:04:40 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
"This story smells like a month-old beached whale."

Those were good "if-then" propositions. And it's interesting that you would say those things. Since I've never seen you get behind anything with even the faintest odor of tinfoil to it, I have to give your opinion extra credence here. But about the communications between Houston and the orbiter, wouldn't they have a channel with voice encryption, spread spectrum and hidden off on a frequency that was unlikely to be monitored (for holding "sensitive" discussions)?

Boot

78 posted on 02/05/2003 2:04:43 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Why would he tell the media? They have not really shown a big interest in going after the whole truth. Neither has NASA as of yet. I think your congressman would be the perfect person to go to.

79 posted on 02/05/2003 2:04:45 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mr.pink
Oh, I could do the same thing with Paint Shop Pro. Still the original source didn't budge from what they stated it was. I guess the Italians and the Israeli news service are bogus????
80 posted on 02/05/2003 2:06:20 PM PST by DittoJed2 (Rejoice in the Lord always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson