Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
>>>...The City of Oakland decided that Rosenthal was such an officer, engaging in officially sanctioned activity, and hence was entitled to immunity for his acts.

This was no sting operation as you have described it. It was possession for distribution.

Cops cannot do that and the city cannot authorize it. Only doctors and pharmasists with authorization by way of a federal authorization can distribute controlled substances. I will bet that all your cops could have told them that.

92 posted on 02/05/2003 3:53:53 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Dan(9698)
It was possession for distribution

What is it when an undercover officer sells crack to an unsuspecting buyer? Possession with intent to distribute. He possesses it, he intends to distribute it - he must be guilty of a crime, right?

No, because the law permits public officials immunity for such acts in furtherance of the state's classic right to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. Just like Rosenthal.

96 posted on 02/05/2003 4:01:15 PM PST by general_re (Take care of the luxuries and the necessities will take care of themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson