LOL!...Wholesale name calling.
You sit at a UN Agenda 21 roundtable to dictate UN policy, then use "(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)" for your tag line and I'm the hypocrite?
You're right hypocrite isn't the right word, fraud would be a more fitting title for you.
In the very piece from which you quoted I wrote, "His purpose was to see rigorous science respected in policy. The final document, presented as "consensus," was rewritten in secret by non-participants, unwittingly serving the interests of a select group of developers, bureaucrats, and politicians. The plan was not only outrageously expensive, it was assured to be hugely destructive to local habitat. It was a fraud.
Dictate policy? Not a bit; and you chose to deliberately misrepresent my words out of your pathetic spite. I was there to try to put a stop to these environmental wackjobs ruining the local forests. I had no idea what the Agenda21 was when I was requested to attend by a friend of mine who was an advocate for the timber industry. I was successful enough that they had to go into a back room to kill it.
At the time, I knew no more about the UN than does any usual citizen. I believed that good laws and a government that actually helps people were a good thing. That was eight years ago. I have learned a great deal more since.
You're right hypocrite isn't the right word, fraud would be a more fitting title for you.