Skip to comments.
Freeper Breaks Foam Problem Story at FR First!!!
Freerepublic ^
| 4/1/03
| Freepers
Posted on 02/04/2003 9:32:29 PM PST by Jael
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: Lancey Howard; Ken H
Hmm, interesting.
I did hear that NASA has asked the lab who did some foam testing a while back not to release the results.
21
posted on
02/05/2003 12:11:16 AM PST
by
Jael
To: davisfh
I agree. They will focus on the tile issue and mention it was foam that damaged it, but I doubt we will ever see complete coverage of the whole issue.
22
posted on
02/05/2003 12:13:28 AM PST
by
Jael
To: unspun
Howdy.
I think that there was ice and foam. ;-)
I think NASA has already said they could tell it was the foam. It came from the left joint where the fuel tank is joined to the Shuttle.
23
posted on
02/05/2003 12:14:47 AM PST
by
Jael
To: Chad Fairbanks
Hi there. I don't really have a ping list per se. But I did clip some names from a few of the other threads regarding the Shuttle to ping to this. I didn't keep it, so unless we cross paths again, you'll probably never hear from me. :-)
I'm Jael. Homeschool mom of a great 11 year old here in the Deep South. :-)
24
posted on
02/05/2003 12:17:07 AM PST
by
Jael
To: Jael
bttt
25
posted on
02/05/2003 12:18:29 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: Black Agnes
Did you catch the reply during the news conference this morning/afternoon about their installing more 'environmentally friendly' foam due to EPA regulations or some such? Man, if somebody is responsible for such a decision without properly testing the foam first, he better not cross my path, or else I just might kick his @$$!
there was a guy on another site that was talking about it the day of the launch, and for some reason everyone was trashing him. I'm not sure where he first got the info though.
To: Lancey Howard
The memory of our astronauts and the integrity of the space program demand that no stone can be left unturned.
Demand all you want. The only ones that will know the truth are Freepers and a few others. The public will be fed a crock of Clintons and they'll buy it. Just like so many other lies about other disasters. You think the EPA will take any heat for this? Do you think any enviromentalists will have a finger pointed at them? Watch how a lie is fabricated and put forward as a fact. It's a learning process and as much as it makes you sick you'll expect it because that is the way things work. I didn't write the book but I've learned from it.
To: Jael
To: Chad Fairbanks
PING ME! PING ME!
30
posted on
02/05/2003 1:29:27 AM PST
by
dasboot
To: Jael
Sorry Chad.....PING ME!
31
posted on
02/05/2003 1:30:16 AM PST
by
dasboot
To: Jael; All
32
posted on
02/05/2003 1:46:47 AM PST
by
backhoe
(The 1990's will be remembered as "The Decade of Fraud(s)..." ( Clintons, Dot-Bombs, Oslo... ))
To: backhoe
ping
33
posted on
02/05/2003 1:47:43 AM PST
by
SeeRushToldU_So
( Something witty, etc, etc....)
To: Jael
I keep my screen on FreeRepublic all day. This is the best place to read it first !
34
posted on
02/05/2003 5:35:10 AM PST
by
kassie
(God Bless and Protect Our Military)
To: Jael
Just checking - I'm on too many ping lists as it is, so I like to nip stuff in the bud ;0)
35
posted on
02/05/2003 7:19:17 AM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
('I WISH, at some point, that you would address those damned armadillos in your trousers." - JustShe)
To: Jael; fooman
Has anyone seen liftoff video from the flight two flights prior to STS-107? Where there was another event where material hit the orbiter?
I'm hearing things......
To: isthisnickcool
I am not aware of another event, but if there is one do tell.
37
posted on
02/05/2003 7:24:45 AM PST
by
fooman
(PC Kills!)
To: fooman
I have heard this A.M. that STS-105 came back with obvious damage that may have been caused by the "foam/ice" or something else and that people were calling for grounding the orbiters.
I cannot find any video but there are some photos here. It's hard to compare the "before and after" flight images. The orbiter looks very "pock marked" to me but it could be photographic variables. Note that in some of the photos they are making videos of the orbiter so I'm sure NASA has detailed data on this and other missions.
Some people seem to think that Ron Dittmore's days are numbered and that a lot of heads are going to roll as more facts come out.
Houston, we've got a problem........
To: isthisnickcool
Thanks for the info. Its these kind of contribution that make this place great.
39
posted on
02/05/2003 8:39:45 AM PST
by
fooman
(PC Kills!)
To: Lancey Howard
Typically, the EPA will force a MANUFACTURER to change formulations. I think that NASA simply ordered the stuff from manufacturer XYZ who was under EPA scrutiny and had to change the formula.
The fact that the manufacturer advised NASA of the difficulty doesn't change anything--NASA cannot or would not appeal for an exception to EPA "thought" on the matter.
40
posted on
02/05/2003 9:45:36 AM PST
by
ninenot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson