Columbia on the Net (Freerepublic.com acknowledged)

MSNBC ^

[Normal4me]

But more informal Web writing makes for just as fascinating reading. A nearly two-month long Space.com thread that tracked the shuttle’s progress is, as one poster puts it, “Almost like a dark novel, full of foreboding, clues to the pending disaster.” A FreeRepublic.com thread is equally sad. The “Mission Status Center” at SpaceFlightNow.com contains another minute-by-minute account of the shuttle’s flight.

[Rebelbase]

"The reason is that most reporters in the lamestream media are not very well educated, and DON'T THINK ABOUT WHAT THEY ARE REPORTING"

I read something on one of the threads that CNN had reported that the Shuttle was travelling at the "speed of light".

[Rebelbase]

Is that new trouble? The previous trouble with the LA Times and the Compost have been settled...I think.

[GovernmentShrinker]

To be fair, the major commercial news outlets do need to add a few steps between what a reporter types out quickly and what is put on the wires and websites. There's no serious financial or reputational fallout, or liability issues, when Joe Freeper posts a comment that turns out to be utterly wrong. But if AP/Reuters/UPI puts a story out on the wire saying the shuttle crashed -- only to find out 5 or 10 minutes later that it really didn't, there's some serious harm done.

[Constitution Day]

I read something on one of the threads that CNN had reported that the Shuttle was travelling at the "speed of light".

Einstein would be most disappointed in them.

[Brad’s Gramma]

Ping!