To: habs4ever
Containment is for those who lack the will to defend themselves. I would say that containment is for those who value their own skins more than their ambitions. If someone doesn't care much about their own skin, or has "plausibly deniable" allies or lackeys who don't care about theirs, then containment will and has failed.
18 posted on
02/04/2003 1:56:55 PM PST by
El Gato
To: El Gato
There is the confused notion that Al Qaeda and Iraq and Hamas and Hezbollah seek to bring American citizens to a terrorized state. This is short-sighted. Al Qaeda and Iraq (to name but two) want nothing less than the destruction of America as a world power. The traditional goal of terrorists is to immobilize a people and persuade them to not fight. The goal of these enemies of America goes much further; these enemies want to bring down this nation. Because of that reality, this 'war on terrorism' is actually a war to survive as a nation. What Colin Powell presents on Wednesday should be viewed in the context of defining a very dangerous and active enemy and that enemy's connection to fellow enemies hell-bent on our destruction, not just our immobilization.
19 posted on
02/04/2003 2:13:57 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: El Gato
I'm not sure I understand your post.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson