Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: habs4ever
Containment is for those who lack the will to defend themselves.

I would say that containment is for those who value their own skins more than their ambitions. If someone doesn't care much about their own skin, or has "plausibly deniable" allies or lackeys who don't care about theirs, then containment will and has failed.

18 posted on 02/04/2003 1:56:55 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
There is the confused notion that Al Qaeda and Iraq and Hamas and Hezbollah seek to bring American citizens to a terrorized state. This is short-sighted. Al Qaeda and Iraq (to name but two) want nothing less than the destruction of America as a world power. The traditional goal of terrorists is to immobilize a people and persuade them to not fight. The goal of these enemies of America goes much further; these enemies want to bring down this nation. Because of that reality, this 'war on terrorism' is actually a war to survive as a nation. What Colin Powell presents on Wednesday should be viewed in the context of defining a very dangerous and active enemy and that enemy's connection to fellow enemies hell-bent on our destruction, not just our immobilization.
19 posted on 02/04/2003 2:13:57 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato
I'm not sure I understand your post.
20 posted on 02/04/2003 2:19:54 PM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson