Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GailA
I read the whole article and couldn't believe how pro-tax and out of touch it was with reality, ie voters paying taxes. One of their charming misbeliefs was "state governments should never cut taxes during temporary revenue increases". Why not?

Another one was, "voters never accept a cut in services". I'm not aware of that! For example, wouldn't Tenn. be balanced if they cut back on Tenn Care? Has anyone proposed that? Say an income test?

The article reads as if it were written by a pro-tax, pro-big government pork spending bureaucrat.
15 posted on 02/04/2003 8:03:55 AM PST by Forgiven_Sinner (Praying for the Kingdom of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Forgiven_Sinner
See post #12.
18 posted on 02/04/2003 8:54:37 AM PST by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson