Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
Sure it would have. The last part of the confederacy to fall was Texas. They did not surrender until June 1865.

Loss of Sabine would have brought about an earlier collapse would it?

253 posted on 02/06/2003 2:14:05 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Loss of Sabine would have brought about an earlier collapse would it?

It's very likely. Had Sabine been lost, the invasion force would have landed and probably advanced across Texas by 1864. It would have fallen by Lee's surrender instead of surrendering on its own several months later. The south would have also been deprived of blockade runners after Mobile fell in 1864. The north would also have never needed the Red River campaign, which diverted many troops and ships away from the war elsewhere. So in effect, a 40 man garrison at an earthen fort significantly altered the time and course of the war.

254 posted on 02/06/2003 2:20:47 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson