As is evidenced by the generally icoherent and goofy response you offered to my statement, it appears that you are again projecting your own habitual indulgences onto others.
What a hoot!
I suppose I can agree that you do "hoot" a lot, if that is what you are seeking.
There is not a nickel's worth of difference about the way that Washington, Madison, Jackson and Lincoln viewed the nature of the Union. Howzat?
It is not what you said a few posts back. You stated "There was not a nickel's worth of difference in what Washington, Madison, Jackson and Lincoln thought about Union and the Constitution."
It is not what you said a few posts back. You stated "There was not a nickel's worth of difference in what Washington, Madison, Jackson and Lincoln thought about Union and the Constitution."
I don't see any semantic difference between my two statements.
In any case, spin it any way you like. Lincoln was defending the Government of Washington, Madison and Jackson.
Whatshisname's contention that Lincoln set up big government (or whatever he said) is just wrong.
What a hoot!
Walt