Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bonesmccoy
Good science, bones. Hypothesize, test, analyze, conclude, and re-hypothesize. That is how NASA should be doing it. I only wish they had considered some "worst case" scenarios before they brought those poor souls home.
568 posted on 02/08/2003 12:29:47 AM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: capitan_refugio
Thanks for the positive comments.

Even if the NASA-contractor team considered "worst-case" scenarios, there is nothing that either could do.

If the team decided that the vehicle could not reenter, they could not launch the next vehicle without understanding the failure which occured at launch. If they simply launched Discovery to rendezvous/rescue with Columbia, they would have risked the entire STS program without knowing what part failed on the 107 launch.

The team did the right thing. Bring OV-102 in and hope for the best.
769 posted on 02/09/2003 8:32:12 AM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson