Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bonesmccoy
Something else of interest from http://brian.carnell.com/articles/2003/02/000003.html

More on Shuttle Foam Damage from STS-87

By Brian Carnell

Monday, February 3, 2003

This NASA page has notes by a NASA worker from 1997 about the "significant damage" done to STS-87 from the reformulated, Freon-free foam insulation flaking off during the Shuttle's ascent (emphasis added),

 

During the STS-87 mission, there was a change made on the external tank. Because of NASA's goal to use environmentally friendly products, a new method of "foaming" the external tank had been used for this mission and the STS-86 mission. It is suspected that large amounts of foam separated from the external tank and impacted the orbiter. This caused significant damage to the protective tiles of the orbiter. Foam cause damage to a ceramic tile?! That seems unlikly, however, when that foam is combined with a flight velocity between speeds of MACH two to MACH four, it becomes a projectile with incredible damage potential. The big question? At what phase of the flight did it happen and what changes need to be made to correct this for future missions? I will explain the entire process.

And intriguing comments about similar issues during STS-86,

 

The STS-86 mission revealed a similar damage pattern but to a much lesser degree than STS-87. The STS-86 tile damage was accepted ruled as an unexplained anomaly because it was a night launch and did not provide the opportunity for the photographic evidence the STS-87 mission did. A review of the records of the STS-86 records revealed that a change to the type of foam was used on the external tank. This event is significant because the pattern of damage on this flight was similar to STS-87 but to a much lesser degree. The reason for the change in the type of foam is due to the desire of NASA to use "environmentally friendly" materials in the space program. Freon was used in the production of the previous foam. This method was eliminated in favor of foam that did not require freon for its production. MSFC is investigating the consideration that some characteristics of the new foam may not be known for the ascent environment.


40 posted on 02/04/2003 6:27:27 AM PST by RippleFire (Hold mein bier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RippleFire
Great, this could be laid right at the feet of the Envirowackos, (due to the forced elimination of R-12) and the myth of Global Warming.

Another unintended consequence of govt politics.

163 posted on 02/05/2003 7:16:41 AM PST by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: RippleFire
Asbestos-free O-rings helped to destroy Challenger in 1986 and freon-free foam insulation destroyed Columbia in 2003. The environmental wackos are doing a good job in killing humans and destroying our industry and science.

When will root causes get discussed and addressed by NASA and the media??
3,903 posted on 06/12/2003 4:52:05 PM PDT by enviros_kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson