Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 537 Votes
Your comment is not consistent with engineering fact.

The vehicle was at the end of a two week mission, which is the longest an orbiter is capable of sustaining life in orbit.

Extension of the vehicle's mission for another two weeks would have created a tomb where the crew suffers a slow, lingering death of starvation, deprivation, and asphyxiation.

There was no choice but to bring the crew home.
1,597 posted on 02/13/2003 4:14:56 PM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1595 | View Replies ]


To: bonesmccoy
Extension of the vehicle's mission for another two weeks would have created a tomb where the crew suffers a slow, lingering death of starvation, deprivation, and asphyxiation.

Better a blaze of glory, I suppose.

1,600 posted on 02/13/2003 4:30:23 PM PST by null and void (*sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1597 | View Replies ]

To: bonesmccoy
Well, actually he said that this could have been done with foresight. Let's say that someone started with the report by NASA engineer Greg Katnik 5 years ago (Dec 1997), in which he identified debris from external tank to be a damage factor for TPS. Let's say that it was discovered that the shedding of insulation could not be prevented. I am not asserting that this happened; it is is only a hypothetical scenario.

In this hypothetical scenario, someone could have reasoned, hey, let's institute a backup plan: A. a way to investigate in-orbit for TPS damage; B. in the event of critical TPS damage, a way to get extra "expendables" (air, water, station-keeping propellant) to shuttle via unmanned backup system; C. a stopgap TPS patching solution; D. a backup way to get the crew home.

Yes, I know that the engineering challenges would be steep. However, few will dispute that NASA employs some really bright people. Instead of hobbling them with regulations and restrictions, what if some one had turned loose a mitigation "tiger team" of 50-200 really smart "rocket scientists" and engineers? I would be willing to venture that during 5 years such a team could have come up with a backup plan that would have some non-zero probability of success.

That NASA knew the foam was shedding, and damaging TPS tiles, has been documented elsewhere. That NASA knew that the loss of a single critical tile could result in burnthrough, and mission loss, is documented elsewhere. That NASA had no backup plan, no mitigation, is documented elsewhere (they stated this openly on the day of the disaster). This is profundly sad. I doubt very much that the NASA of Werner von Braun's time would have had no solutions to offer.

1,622 posted on 02/13/2003 6:51:04 PM PST by Resolute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1597 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson