Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
To: XBob

7:52 a.m. CST: Three left main landing gear brakeline temperatures show an unusual rise. "This was the first occurrence of a significant thermal event in the left wheel well," Dittemore said. Engineers do not believe the left wheel well was breached, but rather that hot gasses were somehow finding a flow path within the wing to reach the wheel well.

7:53 a.m. CST: A fourth left brakeline strut temperature measurement rose significantly -- about 30-40 deg. in 5 min.

7:54 a.m. CST: With the orbiter over eastern California and western Nevada, the mid-fuselage mold line where the left wing meets the fuselage showed an unusual temperature rise. The 60F rise over 5 min. was not dramatic, but showed that something was heating the wing fuselage interface area at this time. Wing leading edge and belly temperatures were over 2,000F. While the outside fuselage wall was heating, the inside wall remained cool as normal.

7:55 a.m. CST: A fifth left main gear temperature sensor showed an unusual rise.

7:55.53 a.m. CST: A video image taken with this time stamp of Columbia showed a sizable brightly glowing object separate from the shuttle and fall back into it's wake. The object was too large to be a tile. These things had been seen before. No, it was much bigger than a tile. It could very well be the left side landing gear door. The kid who shot the video could be heard saying, "Did you see that?" "What was that?" (the object was bright enough to illuminate the contrail in the darkness.) It appeared to be rectangular, IMO.

7:57 a.m. CST: As Columbia was passing over Arizona and New Mexico, the orbiter's upper and lower left wing temperature sensors failed, probably indicating their lines had been cut. The orbiter was also rolling back to the left into about a 75-deg. left bank angle, again to dissipate energy and for navigation and guidance toward Runway 33 at Kennedy, then about 1,800 mi. away.

757:00 a.m. CST USAF photo is taken by telescope at the Starfire Range. It shows plasma burning and streaming debris from the left wing on the inboard leading edge going back over the wing resulting in a contrail.

7:58 a.m. CST: Still over New Mexico, the elevons began to move to adjust orbiter roll axis trim, indicating an increase in drag on the left side of the vehicle. That could be indicative of "rough tile or missing tile but we are not sure," Dittemore said. At the same time, the elevons were reacting to increased drag on the left side of the vehicle, the left main landing gear tire pressures and wheel temperature measurements failed. This was indicative of a loss of the sensor, not the explosion or failure of the left main gear tires, Dittemore believes. The sensors were lost in a staggered fashion.

7:59 a.m. CST: Additional elevon motion is commanded by the flight control system to counteract right side drag. The drag was trying to roll the vehicle to the left, while the flight control system was commanding the elevons to roll it back to the right. But the rate of left roll was beginning to overpower the elevons, so the control system fired two 870-lb. thrust right yaw thrusters to help maintain the proper flight path angle. The firing lasted 1.5 sec. and, along with the tire pressure data and elevon data, would have been noted by the pilots.

At about this time, the pilots made a short transmission that was clipped and essentially unintelligible

In Mission Control, astronaut Marine Lt. Col. Charles Hobaugh, the spacecraft communicator on reentry flight director Leroy Cain's team, radioed "Columbia we see your tire pressure [telemetry[ messages and we did not copy your last transmission."

One of the pilots then radioed "Roger," but appeared to be cut off in mid transmission by static. For a moment there was additional static and sounds similar to an open microphone on Columbia but no transmissions from the crew.

All data from the orbiter then stopped and the position plot display in Mission Control froze over Texas, although an additional 30 sec. of poor data may have been captured.

Controllers in Mission Control thought they were experiencing an unusual but non-critical data drop out. But they had also taken notice of the unusual buildup of sensor telemetry in the preceding few minutes.

About 3 min. after all data flow stopped, Hobaugh in mission control began transmitting in the blind to Columbia on the UHF backup radio system. "Columbia, Houston, UHF comm. check" he repeated every 15-30 sec., but to no avail. In central Texas, thousands of people at that moment were observing the orbiter break up at Mach 18.3 and 207,000 ft.

Milt Heflin, Chief of the Flight Director's office said he looked at the frozen data plots. "I and others stared at that for a long time because the tracking ended over Texas. It just stopped.

1231 posted on 02/10/2003 9:23 PM CST by wirestripper [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1217 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

I plugged the USAF photo into the timeline I posted earlier. We have to assume the times are approximate, but within seconds due to timekeeping discrepencies that always exist.

1,305 posted on 02/11/2003 12:32:05 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1303 | View Replies ]


To: All
I realized, late last night (4am, but couldn't connect) that some people might have a distorted view of what the aerodynamic enviorenment is like at 200 to 400,000 feet and 12 to 16,000 mph, so I did some calculations.

The aerodynamic forces are quite low. The orbiter computer system uses a force of 10 pounds/sqft to activate the elevons and 20 pounds/sqft to activate the elevator(s). No where during reentry to the astonauts pull more than minus one G, about the same as a good sports car during braking. The aero forces never exceed a few ounces per sq inch or about 50 pounds/sqft.

However, the thermodynamic effects are equivalent to about 3000 degree air.

The bottom line is that reentry is about like a 70mph surface wind at 3000 degrees (imagine flying into the nozzel of a propane burner). You could easily hold your hand out the window, but it would be burned off in seconds.

For those that think that the landing gear doors opened minutes before the final breakup, please realize that the top side of the wheel well would burn out in seconds and the wing structure shortly after. The gear doors could not have been open.
1,306 posted on 02/11/2003 1:32:12 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1305 | View Replies ]

To: wirestripper
This may be a bit off-topic but..

I have seen the sensor readings before and have found this link during one of my searches:

http://spacelink.nasa.gov/NASA.Projects/Human.Exploration.and.Development.of.Space/Human.Space.Flight/Shuttle/Shuttle.Missions/Flight.030.STS-28/Orbiter.Modifications

Paragraph 5 states:
"Columbia, which flew the first five flights of the Shuttle program, features more instrumentation than the other two ships for research and development. Much of the instrumentation will be hooked up during its eighth flight, including about 400 strain gauges on the wings, payload bay doors and vertical stabilizer to monitor loads, pressures and temperatures during flight. For aerothermal analysis, about 140 sensors have been installed on the wing area.".

Now I know this fairly old information (Flight.030.STS-28) but I was wondering if all of those sensors were hooked up and still around/in-use to this point. (“instrumentation will be hooked up during its eighth flight” - operative words being “will be”).

I find it curious that not many sensors were reporting irregularities (plus the lack of more sensors than what is shown). With the kind of stresses involved, wouldn’t there be more useful data than what we are being told? Or do you think this data would be simply collected onboard for eventual analysis after the shuttle lands? (In which case that information may be lost.)

I believe the addition of those sensors to your sequence of events would have proved to be extremely valuable (if that data was available).
1,310 posted on 02/11/2003 2:01:05 PM PST by halfbubbleofflevel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson