Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Observation on TPS damage on Orbiter
NASA photos | 2-3-03 | BoneMccoy

Posted on 02/04/2003 1:34:19 AM PST by bonesmccoy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 4,541-4,548 next last
To: Jim Noble
I bet the shuttle turned or flipped in a second, and a second later it was gone.

i agree - see also 137
141 posted on 02/05/2003 1:28:44 AM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: r9etb; Political Junkie Too
see 137
142 posted on 02/05/2003 1:32:20 AM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
good summary see #137
143 posted on 02/05/2003 1:40:09 AM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
thanks much for the bump, tb

see#137 and follow the directions, downlad 3 files to disk, and play them, full screen mode
144 posted on 02/05/2003 2:00:34 AM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy

The small plume appears to be about the orientation and momentum of the original object.

Exactly what I thought. That small plume maintains the origional trajectory, or seems to.

Does the larger plume appear to originate from a more lateral or port origin than the smaller plume that you see in frame 10 or 11?

I can't tell just where the larger piece seems to origionate from. I have looked at that sequance any number of times and can't really tell. However, it seems to origionate from a slightly more inboard area.

What puzzles me is that after impact, the plume from the large piece of debris does not look to follow the origional trajectory but appears to take a slightly outboard (port) track.

I'm not saying it does, it could be nothing more than an illusion, or my eyes playing tricks on me.

Is it possible that a heaveier piece of debris could change direction slightly after impact at that speed, and if so, would it be noticable?

145 posted on 02/05/2003 2:18:13 AM PST by Budge (God Bless FReepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
NASA would need to triangulate the videography done at Owens Valley with the videography in Nevada to evaluate if it is the same piece.

Yes, I would think the Owens Valley photos might have exact time of the first sighting of debris falling off which would be needed for triangulation from the boys video (who were in Wupatki National Monument (NE of Flagstaff) in northern Arizona). The boys video only has time from the camera, which seems to coincide with NASA tempature off scale low. Wouldn't they need exact times for triangulation?

On another note, Justa (in post 87) says the plume is steam. If that is the case then that was a large chunck of ice/TPS, and may account for the (seeming) deviation in trajectory.

Comments?

146 posted on 02/05/2003 2:39:25 AM PST by Budge (God Bless FReepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; bonesmccoy
Just heard on FOX news that tiles/wing parts found in Kalifornia.
147 posted on 02/05/2003 2:42:44 AM PST by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: exnavy
Updates please, nothing on my local staions yet. The debris reported outside of Phoenix earlier turned out to be burned toast, I hope this report is solid evidence. Since the tiles are individually numbered, even one tile could pinpoint the source of a burn through.
148 posted on 02/05/2003 2:58:52 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper; HardStarboard; bonesmccoy; r9etb; tophat9000; Jim Noble
Late for work. Many good theories presented that I would like to comment/ask questions after work.

Keep the thread going.

149 posted on 02/05/2003 3:24:03 AM PST by Budge (God Bless FReepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Budge
>>Many good theories presented that I would like to comment/ask questions after work<<

You mean you don't freep at work?

150 posted on 02/05/2003 3:28:09 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: exnavy; XBob
Thanks for keeping me posted. I'll have to go to a neighbor's house to see the .mpegs - My Pentium 100 just won't hack it.

Memo to all: I spoke of the ET LH2 repress line earlier. We in the business called it that (I've also heard it called "pre-press"). Apparently, the correct name is ET LH2 pressurization line. Also, the forward orbiter-et attach point is called the bi-pod.

Would anybody be interested if I posted the tile drawing of the bottom of the orbiter?

151 posted on 02/05/2003 5:22:34 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
"Would anybody be interested ... tile drawings ...?"

Yes!

152 posted on 02/05/2003 5:38:05 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
Sorry, I had to leave home for work. Fox website has article that NASA is investagating reports, waiting for more.
153 posted on 02/05/2003 5:54:23 AM PST by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Yes it would be interesting to see the tile drawings.
154 posted on 02/05/2003 5:55:35 AM PST by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Truth29; exnavy
I have to go look for a job right now, but I should be able to have a friend scan it in and post it later this afternoon.

Wish me luck.

155 posted on 02/05/2003 6:36:16 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: freepersup
flume uh... = plume
156 posted on 02/05/2003 6:44:49 AM PST by freepersup (And this expectation will not disappoint us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Good call. I started thinking myself that the plume we are seeing might not be the debris of the falling object only, but it could also include pulverized ceramic tile dust. We might be seeing the actual pulverized tiles flying off the orbiter in this video.
157 posted on 02/05/2003 6:51:36 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Sorry, I didn't see your reply until today (New posts to me didn't show). I will read through the rest of the thread to see if anyone else posted it for you - if not, I'll see if I can find a better one.
158 posted on 02/05/2003 7:06:59 AM PST by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: snopercod


CLOSE UP OF EXTERNAL TANK


HI RES CLOSE UP

COMPLETE STS-107 OFFICIAL PICS

159 posted on 02/05/2003 7:07:16 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Another super close up of the area where the insulation/ice must have come from.

http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-107/images/high/KSC-03PD-0074.jpg
160 posted on 02/05/2003 7:11:23 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 4,541-4,548 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson