[FITZ]

A better tact, perhaps, would be to argue that Conservatives should support this expenditure, if it's tied to ending tax payer funded migrations of Somalians into the United States.

That would never be done, our government is the one bringing them here, giving them "refugee" status and welfare benefits here.

I completely don't understand why the US taxpayer should pay for African AIDS, we didn't cause them to have promiscuous sex, we can't stop them from having that. No money was spent to prevent AIDS in heterosexual, monogamous couples because that's the only way to prevent the spread and it doesn't take money.

[JohnGalt]

None of it makes sense and none of it's Constitutional; should we spend our days complaining about the liberal media or should we look to score some wins?