Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
such a shield would not be "reusable".

Ablative shields were used on manned capsules prior to orbiter.

The issue is not the TPS fragility.

The issue is why did a piece of the ET insulation fall off the ET.
92 posted on 02/03/2003 10:45:02 PM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


Our space program is a joke.

The shuttle is a dog.

The undeniable fact is the Astronauts have a one in fifty chance of being blown to bits.

Krauthamer is right.
95 posted on 02/03/2003 10:48:27 PM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: bonesmccoy
The issue is not the TPS fragility.

Let me tell you about TPS reports....


100 posted on 02/03/2003 10:50:13 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks ('I WISH, at some point, that you would address those damned armadillos in your trousers." - JustShe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: bonesmccoy
such a shield would not be "reusable".

Naturally. Hopefully the price wouldn't be too expensive. BTW, how many missions are the tiles good for?

The issue is not the TPS fragility.

What sort of impact can the tiles withstand? It would seem to me that there is a significant risk of the shuttle being hit by a small piece of space junk during a mission. Having the tiles be somewhat protected until re-entry would seem like a good idea. Perhaps they're generally strong enough without, but if they're brittle I was thinking a slightly less brittle layer on top might help prevent damage.

183 posted on 02/03/2003 11:36:40 PM PST by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson